Legal Opinion

State v. Markham

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 2002No. 24021PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParrish, J.

John Thomas Markham (defendant) was convicted, following a jury trial, of manufacturing a controlled substance (Count I), § 195.211.2 1 , possession of methamphetamine, a controlled substance (Count II), § 195.202, RSMo 1994, possession of drug paraphernalia (Count III), § 195.233, and possession of ephedrine with intent to manufacture methamphetamine (Count IV), § 195.246. This court affirms.

For purposes of appellate review, the evidence at trial most favorable to the verdicts is accepted as true. State v. Brown, 58 S.W.3d 649, 651 (Mo.App.2001). Contrary evidence is disregarded. Id.

Defendant…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. McMillinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  2. State v. SilveySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. State v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  4. State v. WolfeSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. State v. GoudeauMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. State v. WolfMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. State v. CollinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. TilleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API