Legal Opinion

Bass v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 1997No. WD 52916PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAURA DENVIR STITH, Judge.

Sandra Bass appeals the motion court’s denial of her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Ms. Bass claims that the plea court did not have jurisdiction to convict her of rape because, as a female, she was incapable of committing that crime. We disagree. As have other jurisdictions addressing this issue, we hold that a female may be held guilty of rape where, as here, she has aided another to commit the rape.

Ms. Bass also argues that conviction of both rape and child abuse subjected her to double jeopardy in violation of Section…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. State v. StoreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  5. State v. IsaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BarnumSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  2. Peiffer v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. State v. DoddMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. RiggsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Ivy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API