Legal Opinion

Clark v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 20, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Batlipf —

Affirming.

Appellant, Huston Clark, an infant under twenty-one years of age, suing by his father and next friend, Fred Clark, brought this suit in the Jefferson circuit court against the city of Louisville and its Board of Park Commissioners for the recovery of damages for personal injury received by tbe plaintiff while using a swing erected in and a part of the equipment of Portland Park, which is owned, equipped, and maintained by the city through and by its Park Commissioners, as a public park.

Plaintiff alleged that on or about the 18th day of May,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of Park Commissioner v. PrinzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Capp v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  3. Paraska v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Greenwood v. LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
  5. Van Pelt v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schwindel v. Meade CountyKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Wallace v. Laurel County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Carr v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. South Elkhorn Village, LLC v. City of Georgetown, et al.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API