Legal Opinion

Van Pelt v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 21, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirm-. ing.

The appellant and plaintiff below, Mrs. Yerna Yan Pelt, who was 25 years of age, was employed in the laundry of the city hospital of the appellee and defendant below, city of Louisville. She was at work at a machine for ironing the laundry, used chiefly by nurses, physicians, and attendants, and for bedding equipment in the operation of the hospital. The small amount of outside laundry work done therein was for the benefit of other city public undertakings, mostly, if not entirely, of towels used at public parks. Plaintiff fed the ironing table…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cook v. John N. Norton Memorial InfirmaryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Browder v. City of HendersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. City of Bowling Green v. BandyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  4. White v. City of HopkinsvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Johnson's Administrator v. Commissioners of SewerageCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hagerman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Wilcox v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  4. Clark v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  5. Pelfrey's Adm'x v. City of JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API