Legal Opinion

Pappas v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM SHELBY Appeal from the Criminal ■ Court of Shelby County. —Jesse Edington, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Gholsen, Special Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted of removing beyond the limits of the State of Tennessee personal property, the title to which had been retained in another at the time of his purchase thereof, without the consent of the seller of said personal property in writing. He has appealed and assigned errors.

It is shown that the property described in the indictment was purchased by the defendant by a written contract of conditional sale, which expressly prohibited the defendant from removing the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wescott v. BinfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Haggerty v. St. Louis Ice Manufacturing & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  3. State v. FosterSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1900
  4. Debardelaben v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ShedoudyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State v. CasperTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Hunter v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Manahan v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  5. McKnight v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API