Legal Opinion

Debardelaben v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1897PublishedCited by 15 opinions

FROM KNOX. • Appeal from Criminal Court of Knox County. T. A. R. Nelson, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

Debardelaben was presented, tried, convicted, and fined, in the Criminal Court of Knox County, for betting on a horse race while without the inclosure within which the race was run. He has appealed in error, and asks a reversal of the judgment.

Debardelaben was the proprietor of a poolroom, kept and operated for the purpose of betting on horse races. He conducted this business in the city of Knoxville, under a license issued to him by the municipal authorities, and in the belief that the license made his business lawful. In May, 1897, while in his poolroom at Knoxville, with the usual display…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sutton v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Motlow v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Rohan v. Detroit Racing AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Commonwealth v. Kentucky Jockey ClubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  5. Jones, Chief Safety Inspector v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API