Legal Opinion

C & P Telephone Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1994No. 92-AA-40PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Chief Judge:

Petitioner, C & P Telephone Company, seeks review of a decision of the District of Columbia Department of Employment Services that petitioner must pay intervenor Pa-trida Robertson’s attorney’s fees under the District of Columbia Workers’ Compensation Act, D.C.Code § 36-330(a) (Repl.1993). Petitioner contends that the agency erred as a matter of law in ruling that § 36-330(a) applied where the employer had initially voluntarily provided some compensation, in the form of medical services, but did not pay monetary compensation immediately upon receipt of a doctor’s report…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. George Hyman Construction Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Santos v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Todd Shipyards Corporation, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Melvin WattsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Savannah Machine & Shipyard Company v. Director, Office Of Workers' Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fluellyn v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Providence Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. National Geographic Society v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Goba v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Crutchfield v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API