Providence Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Associate Judge:
Petitioner Providence Hospital (“Providence”) seeks review of a decision of the District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (“DOES”) requiring Providence to pay intervenor Veronica Gourzong-Rose’s (“Gourzong-Rose”) attorney’s fees pursuant to D.C.Code § 32-1530(b)(2001). 2 Providence contends that the DOES erred in awarding attorney’s fees under § 32-1530(b), arguing that the agency’s decision was contrary to the plain language of the statute. Specifically, Providence argues that an award of attorney’s fees under § 32-1530(b) is contin gent upon a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Oubre v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Office of People's Counsel v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Lee v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Georgetown University Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- District of Columbia Office of Tax & Revenue v. Bae System Enterprise System Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Fluellyn v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Nathalia L. Brown v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Potomac Electrical Power CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Johnson v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.