Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Cook

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided April 23, 1968No. Nos. 231542 and 232566PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.

These two cases are being considered and decided together as the basic issue in both cases is the same.

Before this court are these specific matters for consideration in both cases:

*183(1) A request for a declaratory judgment on the construction of Regulation LCc-l-53-II of the Ohio Liquor Control Commission that A & P’s game known as “Bonus Bingo,” Pepsi Cola’s distribution of bottle caps with imprinted playing card symbols through A & P stores, and Kroger’s game known as “Races to Riches.”(2) Mandatorily enjoin the defendant to process pending applications to transfer Class C-l and C-2 permits…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Federal Communications Commission v. American Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. R. F. Keppel & Bro. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Horner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. State ex rel. Federal Homes Properties, Inc. v. SingerOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Troy Amusement Co. v. AttenweilerOhio Court of Appeals · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stotts v. PiersonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
  2. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API