Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Federal Homes Properties, Inc. v. Singer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1967No. 39993PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

As a preliminary observation, it "is at least doubtful whether the conditional writ as issued by the Court of Appeals is authorized or valid. The function of mandamus is to compel the performance of a present existing duty as to which there is a default. It is not granted to take effect prospectively, and it contemplates the performance of an act which is incumbent on the respondent when the application for a writ is made. 34 American Jurisprudence 868, Section 79; 35 Ohio Jurisprudence 2d 266, Section 21; State, ex rel. Stanley, v. Cook, Supt. of Banks, 146 Ohio St. 348, paragraph ten of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State Ex Rel. Stanley v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State ex rel. Central Service Station, Inc. v. MasheterOhio Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Willis v. SheboyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Home Care Pharmacy, Inc. v. CreasyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State ex rel. Kronenberger-Fodor Building Co. v. City of ParmaOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Stotts v. PiersonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API