Legal Opinion
State v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 14, 2014No. 2012-239PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrawford, J.
¶ 1. Defendant appeals from his conviction of sexual assault. He contends that the case should have been dismissed on speedy trial grounds and that he is entitled to a new trial based on statements made in closing argument by the prosecution. We affirm.
¶ 2. Defendant was charged on March 3, 2010 with a single count of sexual assault without consent and released on bail. He was initially defended by Attorney Richard Goldsborough. Preparation and trial of the case were complicated because two of the State’s witnesses, including the complaining witness, are deaf and required the assistance of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Barron Ex Rel. Tiernan v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Vermont v. BrillonSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. Matthew WebsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- Glassford v. Dufresne & Associates, P.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- State v. Timothy P. PerleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- State v. Richared E. LadueSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- State v. Daniel BlodgettSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.