Legal Opinion

State v. Sexton

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 9, 2006No. 2003-331PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReiber, J.

¶ 1. We accepted this interlocutory appeal to consider

whether a defendant charged with murder may assert either the defense of diminished capacity to reduce the offense to manslaughter, or insanity to excuse the offense entirely, where the voluntary use of illegal drugs was an essential causal factor in the defendant’s psychotic state at the time of the offense. Consistent with the law of this and other states, we conclude that a defendant in these circumstances may argue for a reduction of the offense based upon an inability to form the requisite intent to commit murder, but may not be…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Powell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  5. People v. FreeIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. GrantColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Fly Fish Vermont, Inc. v. Chapin Hill Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  3. State v. CongressSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  4. Morgan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
  5. State v. Jonathan BrunoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API