Davis v. Union Planters Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney
The question before us is whether a certain note is negotiable. If not, the assignee thereof takes it subject to all equities and defenses available between the original parties. 8 C. J., 52.
Oh March 2, 1932, Davis and wife executed their promissory note to the Turley Mortgage Company, Incorporated, a mortgage broker, of Memphis, for $4,000, pav able in installments over a period of years, with interest payable semiannually at the rate of 6 per cent per an-num, and secured same by executing a deed of trust on their home in Memphis.
It was contemplated by the parties that the New York Life…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Enoch v. BrandonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Thorp v. MindemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Farmers' Nat. Bank of Tecumseh v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Chicago Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Paepcke v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cont'nal Natl. Bk. of Ft. Worth v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Mayor of Morristown v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
- United States v. FarringtonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1959
- General Securities Co. v. Sunday School Pub. Board, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
- Third Nat. Bank of Nashville v. KeathleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.