Legal Opinion

Davis v. Union Planters Nat. Bank & Trust Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

The question before us is whether a certain note is negotiable. If not, the assignee thereof takes it subject to all equities and defenses available between the original parties. 8 C. J., 52.

Oh March 2, 1932, Davis and wife executed their promissory note to the Turley Mortgage Company, Incorporated, a mortgage broker, of Memphis, for $4,000, pav able in installments over a period of years, with interest payable semiannually at the rate of 6 per cent per an-num, and secured same by executing a deed of trust on their home in Memphis.

It was contemplated by the parties that the New York Life…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Enoch v. BrandonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Thorp v. MindemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Farmers' Nat. Bank of Tecumseh v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Chicago Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Paepcke v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cont'nal Natl. Bk. of Ft. Worth v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Mayor of Morristown v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  3. United States v. FarringtonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1959
  4. General Securities Co. v. Sunday School Pub. Board, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  5. Third Nat. Bank of Nashville v. KeathleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API