Legal Opinion

United States v. Themy-Kotronakis

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 31, 1998No. 96-4201PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Tim Themy-Kotronakis (“The-my”) was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Utah of criminal contempt under 18 U.S.C. § 401(3) for violating a permanent injunction. Defendant now appeals that conviction. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

BACKGROUND

Themy is a manufacturer of medical devices, the “Ster-O-Lizer” and the “AIDS Treating Machine,” which are subject to regulation under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. In 1986, the United States filed a civil seizure action under the FDCA…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SettleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, and v. The Greyhound Corporation and Greyhound Lines, Inc., AndCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. John A. Voss, United States of America v. Mitchell S. Beals, United States of America v. Brent L. BealsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Emil Richard Yates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  5. United States v. 22 Rectangular or Cylindrical Finished DevicesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. MouradCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. In re:Contempt Order v.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Sybaritic, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
  4. Hayes v. Skywest AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  5. Lucas v. Dadson Manufacturing CorporationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API