Legal Opinion
United States v. 22 Rectangular or Cylindrical Finished Devices
District Court, D. Utah
Decided January 12, 1989No. Civ. 86-C-0486GPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
J. THOMAS GREENE, District Judge.
This matter came before the court on September 2, 1988, pursuant to the parties’ respective cross Motions for Summary Judgment. The United States was represented by Mark A. Heller and Glen R. Dawson, and defendants were represented by William D. Appier and Michael L. Deamer. Counsel submitted memoranda and presented oral argument, after which the court took the matter under advisement. Being now fully advised, the court sets forth its Memorandum Decision and Order.
BACKGROUND
The government brought this action under the Federal Food,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Young v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Article of Drug . . . Bacto-UnidiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Diapulse Corporation of America, Also Known as the Diapulse Manufacturing Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Alcon Laboratories, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Federal Trade Commission v. QT, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Coyne Beahm, Inc. v. United States Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997
- United States v. 789 Cases, More or LessDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1992
- United States v. Endotec, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.