Legal Opinion
Emil Richard Yates v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1963No. 7256PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
The appeal is from an order denying, without a hearing, appellant’s motion un der 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to set aside his conviction and sentence.
In 1957, while serving a sentence in the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas, Yates brought a habeas corpus proceeding in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, which was denied. However, the court ordered that petitioner be released upon bond pending his appeal to this Court from the order denying the writ. One of the conditions of the bond was that appellant “shall voluntarily abide by the final…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- In Re Fidelity Mortgage Investors, Debtor. Fidelity Mortgage Investors, Applicant-Appellee v. Camelia Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. John Allen Powers William Nichols, Contemnor/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Twm Manufacturing Company, Inc., and Turner Quick-Lift Corporation, Plaintiffs v. Dura Corporation and Kidde, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Buffington v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Barbara Buffington, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of James E. Buffington, Deceased David M. Buffington, Individually v. Baltimore County, Maryland, a Body Corporate and Politic Cornelius J. Behan, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Chief of Police Donald Gaigalas, Individually and in His Official Capacity Ronald L. Tucker, Individually and in His Official Capacity, and Daniel Yuska, Individually and in His Official Capacity Joseph Gribbin, Individually and in His Official Capacity L.S. Harvey, Individually and in His Official Capacity Kenneth W. Kramer, Individually and in His Official Capacity William L. Maeser, Individually and in His Official Capacity, in Re John A. Austin James G. Beach, Iii, Barbara Buffington, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of James E. Buffington, Deceased David M. Buffington, Individually v. Baltimore County, Maryland, a Body Corporate and Politic Cornelius J. Behan, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Chief of Police Daniel Yuska, Individually and in His Official Capacity Joseph Gribbin, Individually and in His Official Capacity L.S. Harvey, Individually and in His Official Capacity Donald Gaigalas, Individually and in His Official Capacity Kenneth W. Kramer, Individually and in His Official Capacity Ronald L. Tucker, Individually and in His Official Capacity William L. Maeser, Individually and in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.