Dayton Bar Association v. Swift
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Respondent, Ben Musa Swift of Dayton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0065745, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1995.
{¶ 2} On March 8, 2013, a probable-cause panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline certified a complaint against Swift to the board. In that complaint, relator, Dayton Bar Association, charged Swift with violating six Rules of Professional Conduct based on a pattern of overbilling for work he performed as a court-appointed attorney in the juvenile and general courts of four separate counties.
{¶ 3} At the hearing, the panel heard…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BrickerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- Toledo Bar Assn. v. StahlbushOhio Supreme Court · 2010
3Cited by9 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith.Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- Dayton Bar Assn. v. Swift (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Michael P. CookeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
- Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Robinson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- Toledo Bar Assn. v. Yoder (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.