Legal Opinion

Dayton Bar Association v. Swift

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 2014No. 2013-1987PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Ben Musa Swift of Dayton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0065745, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1995.

{¶ 2} On March 8, 2013, a probable-cause panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline certified a complaint against Swift to the board. In that complaint, relator, Dayton Bar Association, charged Swift with violating six Rules of Professional Conduct based on a pattern of overbilling for work he performed as a court-appointed attorney in the juvenile and general courts of four separate counties.

{¶ 3} At the hearing, the panel heard…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrickerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Toledo Bar Assn. v. StahlbushOhio Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith.Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Dayton Bar Assn. v. Swift (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Michael P. CookeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Robinson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Toledo Bar Assn. v. Yoder (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API