Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2017No. 2014-0197PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

*337 {¶ 1} Respondent, Scott Clifford Smith of Pepper Pike, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0039828, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1988. In August 2011, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Smith with multiple violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct and the Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility, arising from his alleged use of unethical billing practices and charging of excessive fees in five separate cases involving three clients who operated nursing homes in Ohio.

{¶ 2} The Board of Professional Conduct found that Smith engaged in the charged…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Wedge Products, Inc. v. Hartford Equity Sales Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. GeeslinOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Rothman v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Neal-Pettit v. LahmanOhio Supreme Court · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2023
  2. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2023
  3. State v. PalmerOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Robinson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State v. ElliottOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API