Foster v. Employment Security Commission
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
This proceeding was commenced by the Michigan employment security commission to recover employment security taxes.
The MESO now appeals a judgment of the circuit court reversing a decision of the employment security appeal board. The appeal board had found that individuals who “leased” and operated taxicabs owned by appellee Vern Foster rendered services in Foster’s “employment” within the meaning of § 42 of the Michigan employment security act (PA 1936 [Ex Sess], No 1 [MCLA, §421.42; Stat Ann 1960 Rev § 17.545]).
The written opinions of both the appeal board and the circuit judge stated that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tata v. MuskovitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Powell v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Schulte v. American Box Board Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Goodchild v. EricksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Nordman v. CalhounMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sims v. Parke Davis & Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1971
- Alexandria Yellow Cab, Inc. v. Virginia Employment CommissionRichmond County Circuit Court · 1977
- Sliter v. CobbMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- State ex rel. Employment Security Commission v. HuckabeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995