Legal Opinion
Hart v. Forgeus
California Supreme Court
Decided November 17, 1920No. S. F. No. 9252PublishedCited by 9 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.
This is an appeal by defendant from an order of the superior court refusing to change the place of trial of the action from the superior court of Alameda County to that of Santa Cruz County.
The action is one for the recovery of money. It was commenced in Alameda County on February 28, 1919, and on March 11th defendant, who was a resident of Santa Cruz County, was personally served in the city and county of San Francisco. On March 26,1919, defendant’s attorneys, whose offices were in San Francisco, sent by mail to the county clerk of Alameda County, having first served the same, a demurrer to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cook v. PendergastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Pascoe v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Nickerson v. California Raisin Co.California Supreme Court · 1882
- Smith v. Pelton Water Wheel Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lundy v. LettunichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Estate of HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Andrews v. MetznerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Georgeson v. SteinhoferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Adams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.