Legal Opinion

Alford v. Catalytica Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 2002No. COA01-959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYSON, Judge.

I. Facts

Plaintiffs were employees of Catalytica Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“defendant”). Defendant contracted with Eastern Omni Constructors (“Eastern Omni”) to construct and install a new bulk bromine storage/handling system and components for bromine transfer.

On 15 August 1999, there was a rupture of a component part to the storage tank which caused the release of liquid bromine and bromine gas. Human exposure to bromine can cause death if ingested or inhaled and serious injury if it comes in contact with the skin. Plaintiffs were injured after coming into contact with the bromine…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Bazley v. TortorichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  3. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Robert Leon Jenkins, a Minor, by His Mother and Next Friend, Roberta B. Jenkins v. F. W. AverettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  5. Pleasant v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. ConroyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Cameron v. Merisel, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Allen v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  4. Howard v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Alford v. Catalytica Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API