Legal Opinion

Edmonds v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1956No. Civ. No. 16685PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

Plaintiff, a railroad switchman, was injured while working as a skateman in defendant’s retarder yard at Roseville.* He was braking a gondola car loaded *522with poles. He brought this action for damages (1) under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C.A. § 51), alleging (a) that defendant so negligently maintained the track with an unusually steep grade and so carelessly controlled the car that the car moved at an unusually high rate of speed and (b) that defendant so negligently maintained, inspected and serviced the poles (in the car on which plaintiff was injured)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carter v. Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Davis v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Perrett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Crowder v. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. GULF. MOBILE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  2. Hval v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API