Legal Opinion

Hval v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 2, 1979No. A 7702 02141, CA 10689PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

Plaintiff sought to recover under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) for injuries he sustained while working as a car inspector, or carman, on one of defendant’s trains. Plaintiff was injured when a car released by one of defendant’s switchmen from the main track in defendant’s trainyard passed onto a side track, Track No. 3, and collided with a string of cars that plaintiff was inspecting. The accident occurred because the switch controlling Track No. 3 was open, or lined toward Track No. 3, rather than closed.

The task of properly lining up switches is assigned to switchmen. Company…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Ellis v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Powell v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. Brown v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Metropolitan Dade County v. CoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Jett v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Bullock v. BNSF Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API