United States v. Marvin Carpenter, United States of America v. Carpenter's Goldfish Farm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NOONAN, Circuit Judge:
Marvin Carpenter (Carpenter) and Carpenter’s Gold Fish Farm, Inc. (the company) were convicted of making false statements to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (the Service) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001; of killing migratory birds in violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. § 701; and, of violating the Lacey Act, 16 U.S.C. § 3372 by acquiring migratory birds killed in violation of federal law. They appeal.
The case poses a farming culture in which birds are threats to the farmer’s livelihood against a national standard protective of migratory…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Earl Foster BoiseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
3Cited by25 opinions
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. LorenzoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Marks v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Maurice Lashaw King,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.