Legal Opinion
Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 14, 2000No. Nos. 98-55056, 98-55107, 98-55210, 98-55213, 98-55215 and 98-55422PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge McKEOWN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BETTY B. FLETCHER
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal stems from the environmental cleanup of a contaminated wetlands site used originally for petroleum production and later as a mobile home park. The current property owner, Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. (“Carson Harbor”), brought suit principally under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., for reimbursement of costs associated with the cleanup. We are called upon to determine whether, as a matter of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Jones Chemical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Consejo De Desarrollo Economico De Mexicali, A.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Alco Pacific, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- City of Colton v. American Promotional Events, Inc.-WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.