Legal Opinion

Froelich v. United Royalty Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 12, 1955No. 39,840, 39,841PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

Each of these appeals is from a decree of the trial court quieting title of appellee in and to certain land in Ellis county. The cases were consolidated for review in this court and they will be treated throughout this opinion as one case.

Christina Froelich’s land is the north half of the northwest quarter, and Frank Froelich’s land is the north half of the northeast quarter, all located in section 34, range 16 west, in Ellis county, and will hereinafter be referred to as “the land.”

In order to present the situation clearly, we will turn…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  2. Lathrop v. EyestoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  3. Palmer v. CrewsMississippi Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Heckard v. ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. Storm v. Barbara Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cosgrove v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  2. Shepard v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  3. Heyen v. HartnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Kumberg v. KumbergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. Moffit v. SederlundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API