Legal Opinion
Heyen v. Hartnett
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided March 24, 1984No. 55,637PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Prager, J.:
This is an action for a declaratory judgment to construe a certain mineral deed and to determine the ownership of the parties in the oil and gas and other minerals located in a certain tract of land in Stafford County. The essential facts in the case are undisputed. The mineral deed in question was executed and delivered in June of 1925. The handwritten deed provided as follows:
“Deed to An Undivided Interest in Oil, Gas and Other Minerals
“This Indenture, made this _day of June A.D., 1925 between D. C. Masters of Stafford County, Kansas the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lathrop v. EyestoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Shepard v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Brungardt v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
- Cline v. AngleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Froelich v. United Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Foundation for Preservation of Historic Georgetown v. ArnoldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Zurn Constructors, Inc. v. B.F. Goodrich Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1988
- Holly Energy, Inc. v. PatrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- Amoco Production Co. v. Charles B. Wilson, Jr., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.