Legal Opinion

Agajanian v. Cuccio

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1956No. Civ. 21435PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Plaintiffs sued for specific performance, or, in the alternative, for damages. Defendants filed a cross-complaint for ejectment and to quiet title. The court denied specific performance and refused to award damages to plaintiffs. It rendered judgment in favor of the cross-complainants and quieted their title. Plaintiffs appeal.

On October 4, 1951, Peter Cuccio and Anthony Pernechele leased certain real property to plaintiff George E. Agajanian, the pertinent provisions of the lease reading as follows:

“The Lessor’s agrees to lease five acres of land located at Earl & Spencer-Redondo, Southwest…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tanner v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Brown v. CoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Friedrich v. RolandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Paratore v. ScharetgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garvin v. PettigrewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Garvin v. PettigrewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Vantress Farms, Inc. v. SydenstrickerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API