Legal Opinion

Friedrich v. Roland

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 11, 1950No. Civ. 17008PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Leon A. Friedrich commenced this action against Charles Roland and Dorothy Roland for specific performance of a contract to sell a parcel of real property and for damages. Charles Roland filed an answer and cross-complaint to rescind and cancel the contract on the ground of fraud. The summons and complaint were served on Dorothy Roland. Not having answered in the time allowed by law her default was entered. She thereafter moved to be relieved of the default. Her motion was denied. Judgment was for Friedrich. Charles Roland and Dorothy Roland appealed. Their appeals require separate…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Tanner v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Brill v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Rattray v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. White v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Sterling v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fitzsimmons v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Garcia v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Kooper v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Brown v. CoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Hover v. MacKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API