Legal Opinion

Bish v. Aquarion Services Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided October 14, 2003No. 3:03CV1118 (JBA)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruling on Defendants Aquarion’s and U.S. Filter’s Motions to Dismiss [Docs. ##29, 31]

ARTERTON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs commenced this suit to reinstate their retirement medical insurance coverage that was terminated after the transfer of administration of the Bridgeport Water Pollution Control Authority’s waste water treatment facilities, where they had been formerly employed. Defendants Aquarion Services Company, Aquar-ion Company, and Aquarion Water Company (collectively “Aquarion”) moved to dismiss all counts of Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaints that were directed at Aquar-ion. Defendant…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Utility Workers, Local 369 v. NSTAR Electric & Gas Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  2. Preite v. Charles of the Ritz Group, Ltd. Pension PlanDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
  3. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Birchez Associates, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API