Legal Opinion
Utility Workers, Local 369 v. NSTAR Electric & Gas Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 12, 2004No. CIV.A.03-10530-EFHPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HARRINGTON, Senior District Judge.
The plaintiffs allege that the defendant violated federal and state laws when it changed certain retirement benefits to which the plaintiffs were entitled. The plaintiffs include Utility Workers Local 369 (“the Union”) and twenty-five individuals who retired from working for Commonwealth Energy (“Commonwealth”), which was merged with another corporation to form the defendant, NSTAR Electric and Gas Corp. (“NSTAR”). NSTAR has moved for summary judgment on all claims. NSTAR’s motion is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
NSTAR was created in 1999 by the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Cochran v. Quest Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Miara v. First Allmerica Financial Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Ballesteros v. Bangor Hydro-Electric Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2006
- Fisher v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care of New Eng., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Senior v. NSTAR Electric & Gas Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Mo-Kan Iron Workers Pension Fund v. Challenger Fence Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.