Legal Opinion

Brown v. Guy

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1959No. Civ. 23388PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

This action, one for malpractice against the defendant, a chiropractor, has been twice tried and is now before this court on its merits a second time. At the first trial, the jury rendered its verdict for defendant, following which plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was granted on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the same. This order was affirmed (Brown v. Guy, 144 Cal.App.2d 659 [301 P.2d 413]), the evidence there and then being properly viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff.

On retrial, the jury again returned a verdict for defendant. A motion for a new…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kollert v. CundiffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Kircher v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Kalfus v. FrazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. DeWITT v. GlazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. City of Los Angeles v. FrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Natural Gas Equipment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Winningar v. BalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Truck Insurance Exchange v. StilleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Brickell v. WittmarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API