Brown v. Guy
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
This action, one for malpractice against the defendant, a chiropractor, has been twice tried and is now before this court on its merits a second time. At the first trial, the jury rendered its verdict for defendant, following which plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was granted on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the same. This order was affirmed (Brown v. Guy, 144 Cal.App.2d 659 [301 P.2d 413]), the evidence there and then being properly viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff.
On retrial, the jury again returned a verdict for defendant. A motion for a new…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kollert v. CundiffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Kircher v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Kalfus v. FrazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- DeWITT v. GlazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- City of Los Angeles v. FrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Reynolds v. Natural Gas Equipment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Winningar v. BalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. StilleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Brickell v. WittmarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959