Legal Opinion

Kollert v. Cundiff

California Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1958No. L. A. 24930PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment for defendants, contending that the court erred in instructing the jury and in refusing to consider affidavits of jurors offered in support of a motion for new trial to prove misconduct of the jury.

The plaintiffs, Mrs. Kollert, Mrs. Abrahamson, and four children, were riding in a car which Mrs. Kollert was driving *770when it collided with one operated by defendant Cundiff who was then acting in the course of his employment by defendant The Termo Company. Mrs. Abrahamson, who is Mrs. KoIIert’s mother, was riding in the front seat with her. Four children,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Wright v. Illinois & Mississippi Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  4. People v. SuticCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. GidneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. People v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Weathers v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API