Legal Opinion

Vieira v. Balsamo

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 2, 1951PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The defendant is described in the writ as “Anthony Balsamo, doing business as Balsamo’s Market of the City and County of Worcester.” The sheriff’s return shows service in hand upon the defendant “in Worcester.” The action is to recover for injury to the plaintiff’s teeth and mouth caused by biting upon a hard slate-like substance in a can .of soup allegedly purchased by the plaintiff of' the defendant. There was a finding for the plaintiff, the Appellate Division dismissed a report, and the defendant appealed.

There was evidence tending to show that the plaintiff purchased a can of vegetable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. DiLorenzo v. Atlantic National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Kelsey v. Hampton Court Hotel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  3. Herman v. FineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Godfrey v. CaswellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. James B. Rendle Co. v. Conley & Daggett, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Cook v. KozlowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  2. Nugent v. Popular Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  3. Raytheon Manufacturing Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  4. Lapp Insulator Co. Inc. v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  5. Lane v. SmithMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1975

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API