Legal Opinion
Herman v. Fine
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 25, 1943PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
The plaintiff declared upon a judgment which he alleged he had recovered against the defendant. The defendant answered (1) a general denial, (2) payment, (3) a release, and (4) that “the parties” entered into a stipulation, filed in the office of the clerk of the Superior Court “in the case numbered 52901 equity”; that a copy of the stipulation was annexed to the answer in this action; and “that the plaintiff has not exercised his rights as required by the terms of said agreement; wherefore the defendant now owes the plaintiff nothing.” The terms of the stipulation need not be stated further…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ayers v. RatsheskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Dolan v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Commonwealth v. HollisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Hinds v. BowenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Commonwealth v. KoneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Vieira v. BalsamoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Nugent v. Popular Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.