Legal Opinion

Cernes v. Pittsburg Coca Cola Bottling Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1958No. 41,098PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

This was an action, based upon breach of an implied warranty, to recover damages for personal injuries caused by drinking a part of a bottled beverage which contained a foreign substance. The basis of plaintiff’s action was that defendant in bottling and placing the beverage on the market for immediate human consumption impliedly warranted it was wholesome and fit for such purpose, and the contents of the bottle in question being unfit for human consumption, defendant thereby breached such implied warranty.

Defendant (appellant) alleged that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Graham v. Bottenfield's, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  2. Messinger v. FultonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  3. Simmons v. Wichita Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Harvey v. PalmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  5. Marshall v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hoard v. Shawnee Mission Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Maddy v. Vulcan Materials Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
  3. Professional Lens Plan, Inc. v. Polaris Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Chandler v. Anchor Serum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. Connell v. Norton Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API