Connell v. Norton Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Price, J.:
This action was based upon a breach of an implied warranty and sought damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of drinking from a bottle of Coca-Cola which contained a centipede.
The petition, after detailing the facts and circumstances surrounding the purchase of and drinking from the bottle of Coca-Cola, with the resulting nausea, vomiting and physical illness of plaintiff, alleged:
“. . . that said bottle of Coca-Cola, as hereinbefore described, was manufactured, handled, distributed and sold by said defendant and said defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dearborn Motors Credit Corporation v. NeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Beye v. AndresSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Steck v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Cernes v. Pittsburg Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Clemm v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bowman v. DohertySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Hoard v. Shawnee Mission Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Maddy v. Vulcan Materials Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Professional Lens Plan, Inc. v. Polaris Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Schmeck v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.