Legal Opinion

Connell v. Norton Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1960No. 41,869PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

This action was based upon a breach of an implied warranty and sought damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of drinking from a bottle of Coca-Cola which contained a centipede.

The petition, after detailing the facts and circumstances surrounding the purchase of and drinking from the bottle of Coca-Cola, with the resulting nausea, vomiting and physical illness of plaintiff, alleged:

“. . . that said bottle of Coca-Cola, as hereinbefore described, was manufactured, handled, distributed and sold by said defendant and said defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dearborn Motors Credit Corporation v. NeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Beye v. AndresSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Steck v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Cernes v. Pittsburg Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. Clemm v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bowman v. DohertySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. Hoard v. Shawnee Mission Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Maddy v. Vulcan Materials Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
  4. Professional Lens Plan, Inc. v. Polaris Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Schmeck v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API