Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1958No. 40,904PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

This was an action to cancel a warranty deed; for an accounting between the parties, and for possession of certain personal property. Trial was by the district court which found generally for the plaintiff, and the defendant has appealed.

The plaintiff is a widower over 65 years of age; the defendant is a married woman in her late twenties, and both reside in Topeka.

Plaintiff’s petition was in three causes of action. The first was to set aside a deed to real estate located at 1434 Randolph, Topeka, which plaintiff conveyed to defendant as…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cain v. SteelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Wilson v. HolmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  3. Revell v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Messinger v. FultonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. Ziegelasch v. DurrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Potwin State Bank v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Drake v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. Ingram v. IngramSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Andrews v. HandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. Cernes v. Pittsburg Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API