Legal Opinion

State v. Hammonds

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1980No. 7918SC787PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

Defendant argues that the trial court erred by not allowing him to examine prospective jurors as to whether they owned firearms or weapons. “Regulation of the manner and the extent of the inquiry on voir dire rests largely in the trial judge’s discretion. (Citations omitted.) A defendant seeking to establish on appeal that the exercise of such discretion constitutes reversible error must show harmful prejudice as well as clear abuse of discretion. (Citations omitted.)” State v. Young, 287 N.C. 377, 387, 214 S.E. 2d 763 (1975); modified as to death penalty 428 U.S. 903 (1976). We…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. United States v. MatotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. . HorneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. State v. . CorrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GobletCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Long v. Asphalt Paving Co. of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. BarberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API