Legal Opinion

State v. . Correll

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1948PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborNE, J.

Careful consideration of all of the eighty-six assignments of error covering eighty-nine exceptions presented by defendant on this appeal, fails to reveal prejudicial error for which the judgment rendered on verdict returned in the trial below may be disturbed. However, it seems expedient to advert specifically to a few of them.

Four of the assignments of error relate to the action of the trial judge in overruling defendant’s plea in bar based upon verdict of manslaughter on the first trial as hereinabove stated, and to portions of the charge admitting of a verdict of murder in the second…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. . TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. McLamb v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. State v. Matthews.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. State v. . GradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. Perry v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. BowenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API