Legal Opinion
Zane Dickinson v. David Shinn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 22, 2021No. 20-15175PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ZANE DICKINSON, No. 20-15175 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:18-cv-08037- MTL DAVID SHINN, Director; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA, OPINION Respondents-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted November 19, 2020 Phoenix, Arizona Filed June 22, 2021 Before: Richard C. Tallman, Jay S. Bybee, and Bridget S. Bade, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Bade 2 DICKINSON V. SHINN SUMMARY * Habeas Corpus The panel…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Robert Leeds v. Perry RussellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Chad Lee v. Ryan ThornellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Aker v. Attorney General of the State of MontanaDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2022
- Brown v. OliverDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- Buford v. CassadyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.