Legal Opinion

McKibben v. Paulus

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1982No. SC 28488PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner challenges a ballot title prepared for respondent Secretary of State by the Attorney General. The challenged caption and text in full is:

“ENDS STATE’S INVOLVEMENT IN LAND USE PLANNING. RETAINS LOCAL PLANNING.
“QUESTION: Shall the state’s land use authority end, goals be abolished, but land use planning by counties and cities continue?
“EXPLANATION: Measure ends state’s land use authority. It abolishes statewide land use planning goals. It retains and requires city and county land use planning and zoning. Measure abolishes Department of Land Conservation and Development, Land…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zajonc v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Burbidge v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Zajonc v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Americans for Democratic Action v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Phipps v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kreidler v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Kreidler v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Lombard v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API