Legal Opinion
Kreidler v. Eikenberry
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1989No. 55238-0, 55398-0Published
1Opinion of the Court
111 Wn.2d 828 (1989)
766 P.2d 438
MIKE KREIDLER, ET AL, Petitioners,
v.
KENNETH O. EIKENBERRY, as Attorney General, ET AL, Respondents. In the Matter of BALLOT TITLE FOR ALTERNATIVE MEASURE NO. 97B.
Nos. 55238-0, 55398-0.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
January 6, 1989.
Edwards & Barbieri, by Malcolm L. Edwards, Catherine Wright Smith, and Charles Wiggins, for petitioners.
Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, and Edward B. Mackie, Chief Deputy, for respondent State.
Patrick D. Sutherland, Prosecuting Attorney, and Jeffrey L. Watson, Chief Civil Deputy, for respondent Fuller.
Bricklin &…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
- Kreidler v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Board of Regents of the University v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.