Zajonc v. Paulus

After our decision in this case, the petitioner and the respondent filed a joint petition for rehearing in which they agreed that the proposed amended title in the respondent’s memorandum, which was adopted by this court, was misleading and therefore inaccurate. In their joint petition, they point out that after our opinion was released they noted a further problem with the ballot title which had not been addressed by either the petitioner’s Petition to Review Ballot Title or by the respondent’s Answering Memorandum.

The ballot title which we certified contains this sentence in the Explanation: