Legal Opinion

Little Mountains Enterprises, Inc. v. Groom

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 9, 2013No. AC 34287PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALVORD, J.

The plaintiff, Little Mountains Enterprises, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court, following a bench trial, in this breach of contract action against the defendants, David Groom, Dwight Groom and Thomas Groom, as trustees of the McKinney charitable trust, and David E. Groom, as ancillary executor of the estate of J. Donald McKinney. Although judgment was rendered in its favor, the plaintiff claims that the court failed to apply the proper measure of damages. We agree and, accordingly, reverse in part the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts were found…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Naples v. Keystone Building & Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Kavarco v. T. J. E., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  3. Pacelli Bros. Transportation, Inc. v. PacelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Johnson v. HealySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  5. Levesque v. D & M BUILDERS, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bagley v. Yale UniveristyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
  2. Clem Martone Construction, LLC v. DepinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Farrell v. Johnson & JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  4. Fezollari v. JauzovicConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  5. Bell v. University of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API