Legal Opinion

Egan v. Travelers Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

All of the facts in this case bearing upon the accident sustained by plaintiff and its physical conse*598quences to him are detailed in the case of Egan v. Preferred Accident Ins. Co. 223 Wis. 129, 269 N. W. 667, and it will not be necessary to repeat them. As in that case, it is here claimed that there is no evidence to sustain the conclusion of the jury that the accident and resultant bodily injury produced total disability independently and exclusively of all other causes. A careful review of the record satisfies us that this contention cannot be sustained. What was said in the opinion in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. French v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Cretney v. Woodmen Accident CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Herthel v. Time Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Egan v. Preferred Accident Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Schwartz v. Woodmen Accident Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ellice v. INA Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Jones v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Stoffel v. American Family Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Key Life Insurance Co. of South Carolina v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Stoffel v. American Family Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API