Legal Opinion
Egan v. Preferred Accident Insurance Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 10, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.
Plaintiff was a physician practicing his profession in the city of La Crosse. In May, 1917, he had issued to him from defendant a policy of accident insurance which provided for the payment of indemnities,—
“If such bodily injury shall, from the date of the accident and independently and exclusively of all other causes, directly, continuously and totally disable and prevent the insured from performing any and every kind of duty pertaining to' his occupation, and if during the period of such continuance and total disability, such bodily injury shall be the sole and direct cause of any of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Marshall v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Steamship Co. v. TugmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- The MacCabees v. TerrySupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Atlantic National Bank v. Hupp Motor Car Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Alessandro v. Massachusetts Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Stoffel v. American Family Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Egan v. Travelers InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.