Legal Opinion

Cretney v. Woodmen Accident Company

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1928PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

Two principal questions are raised by the record in this case: First, Is the finding of the jury that the deceased came to his death from an injury effected through violent, external, and accidental means, entirely in dependent of all other causes, sustained by the evidence? Second, Was the testimony of Dr. Cooksey properly received in the case?

The defendant contends that the law may be stated as follows: (1st) When an accident causes a diseased condition, which together with the accident results in injury or death complained of, the accident alone is to be considered as the cause of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bohaker v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Leland v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. White v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. French v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Cary v. Preferred Accident InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Browning v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. First Nat. Bank v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States v. GratiotWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  5. Harrington v. HaddenIdaho Supreme Court · 1949

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API