Legal Opinion

Fonger v. Department of Treasury

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1992No. Docket 130294PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent appeals as of right from an order of the Michigan Tax Tribunal that required it to refund to petitioner state income taxes paid on federal pension benefits for tax years 1985 through 1987. Petitioner has cross appealed and argues that respondent was required to refund all state income taxes paid on the pension benefits regardless of any statute of limitations. We have been advised by the parties and the Tax Tribunal that more than three thousand cases pending before the tribunal are being held in abeyance pending the final resolution of this case. We have been further advised that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Selk v. Detroit Plastic ProductsMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Strelecki v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Bolt v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Comerica Bank-Detroit v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. LCI International Telecommunications Corp. v. Department of CommerceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Bolt v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API