Legal Opinion

Comerica Bank-Detroit v. Department of Treasury

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1992No. Docket 128955PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from Ingham Circuit Court Judge Peter D. Houk’s order of April 23, 1990, granting summary disposition for defendants. Defendants have filed a cross appeal from that same order. We reverse the trial court’s decision and remand to the trial court for additional proceedings.

i

The facts in this matter are generally uncontested. This action was filed by plaintiff on October 23, 1983, to seek a refund of taxes paid in 1971, 1974, and 1975. Plaintiff filed amended returns for 1974 and 1975 on July 25, 1983. In addition, plaintiff amended its tax return for 1971 because…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Department of Treasury v. Comerica BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Alma Piston Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Lindsay Anderson Sagar Trust v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Auto-Owners Insurance v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API